4.
~/~ SOHO HELP DESK ~\~
http://www.demc.com
"Habeas, Inc. CEO Responds"
Today's SOHO Help Desk offers a another viewpoint and
explanation on the company, Habeas, Inc., which we have
been discussing in DEMC.
I received the following letter from Anne P. Mitchell,
the CEO of Habeas, Inc. in response to Laurie Rogers'
article, "You ARE going to PAY to send Email". If you
missed this article you can access it from DEMC's
email marketing newsletter archive.
I wanted to share Ms. Mitchell's letter with you as she
clarifies some concerns readers expressed about Habeas,
Inc.. In addition she provides a different perspective
on the potential benefits of Habeas' services.
It will be up to you to decide if Habeas will help or hurt
the Internet. So email your thoughts, opinions and feedback
about Habeas, Inc. for next issue - mailto:helpdesk@demc2.com
=== LETTER TO THE EDITOR ===
Ms. Drew,
I would like to respond to the article which appeared in your
most recent issue, entitled "You ARE going to PAY to send Email",
by Laurie Rogers. Unfortunately, although I'm sure it was
unintentional, Ms. Rogers made several incorrect assertions on
key points about Habeas, and as a result mischaracterized what
we do, and how and why we do it.
To start, I'd like to hasten to reassure you and your readers
that not using Habeas does *not* mean that the email you
send will not be delivered! Habeas has *no* effect on email
which does not contain the Habeas information! The
existence of Habeas has no impact at all on senders who do
not use it, and their email will continue to be delivered just
as it always has. In addition, not only is it untrue that some
day ISPs will only accept Habeas-warranted mail, but, in
fact, we don't even recommend it!
Rather, Habeas is a value-added service. Much like the post
office's special delivery service: if you don't use it, your
regular mail will be delivered just as it always is. If you
choose, you can pay a bit more for special delivery, and the
attendant added assurances. (Although Habeas differs in
that individual senders do not even have to pay for those
extra assurances - individual Habeas licenses are free.)
Where we really add value is for those for whom delivery is
already being impeded, or for those who want reassurance
that their delivery will not be impeded, because their
mailings may look "spammy" even though they are not.
This is happening with increasing frequency as the spam
problem causes receiving sites to draw their spam filters
ever tighter.
In fact, odds are good that some of your readers' mail is
already being filtered or blocked, NOT because it's spam,
but because some IT person, somewhere, decided that it
looked spammy. If your mail is already being filtered
(wrongly) as spam, using us helps with that. If it's NOT
already being filtered as spam, not using us is NOT
going to make it suddenly start being filtered as spam. Not
to put too fine a point on it, but it bears repeating:
not using Habeas will *not* make you any more likely to be
filtered - it will have zero effect.
The only effect using/not using Habeas has is if you *do*
use it, in which case we help your mail get through where it
otherwise might not. For example: AOL and Juno are two
ISPs which make sure that mail from our licensees is
delivered, and not filtered as spam. Neither AOL or Juno is
going to *start* filtering your email as spam just because
you don't use Habeas! But, if they are *already* filtering
your email as spam, if you start using Habeas, your mail
will start getting delivered again.
Does use of our mark in your email say that "it is ok for
people to receive email from you", as Ms. Rogers asserted?
No - that is a judgement call that is certainly not ours to
make! What the Habeas mark says is this: "I, the sender of
this email, self-certify that this email complies with the
Habeas license". We have expended a great deal of effort
and resources to get our ISP and spam-filter partners to
recognize the Habeas mark. The standards of our license
are such that Habeas-compliant mail is email that they can
*know* they should deliver and not block, because their
users have *asked* for it.
For example, they know if mailing list mail comes through
with the Habeas mark, it is promised to be from a double
confirmed list. Does this mean that email from non-confirmed
lists is bad, or will be rejected? No, it means that if the
email would *otherwise* (and wrongly) be rejected as
spam, it will still be delivered, because no matter how it
scored on the "looks like it might be spam" scale, the ISP
knows that because it is warranted to be double confirmed,
it couldn't possibly be spam by any definition.
Another important point is that we don't dictate to anyone
how they should build their mailing lists, or what is or isn't
"ok". We simply say "if you want to include our mark in
your outgoing email, it has to meet this criteria". So, if
I may use DEMC and SendFree as examples, if DEMC has
some mailing lists which are double confirmed, and some
which are not, you could absolutely use our headers in the
double confirmed lists, and continue to send to the other,
single response lists - you simply would not include our
headers in the latter. In fact, many of our licensees who are
in the process of switching to double confirmed will use our
headers in the email to their newer, double confirmed
subscribers, while sending without the headers to their
legacy list members.
Similarly, SendFree could offer the Habeas headers for
those customers who wish to pay for this value-added
feature and have their email list subscribers double confirm,
while your free members would simply continue the service
without the Habeas headers. In fact, we have several
licensees who do just that, and who also take part in our
affiliate program, allowing them to actually offer Habeas at
a discounted rate to their customers.
Finally, I'd like to take a moment to address our pricing. It
is true that our prices for *Bulk commercial mail* are 1/2 to
1 cent an email sent per month, with a $3,000 a month
cap. However, again, that is for B^lk commercial email -
the content of which is primarily marketing or advertising in
nature. And we do have a newsletter exception (for newsletter
email which is not primarily marketing or advertising in nature),
and that is just $200 a year.
So, to recap, the Habeas service is *not* obligatory, it is not
and will not be required by ISPs, and you do *not* have to
start double confirming all of your lists. It is a value-added
service for those who choose to use it, and has no effect at all
on those who don't.
Sincerely,
/s/
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
CEO
Habeas, Inc.
http://www.habeas.com
===
Please keep sending in your feedback. The help and
resources we've been able to share has been terrific.
Send in your questions, answers and thoughts by
emailing: helpdesk@demc2.com
Be sure to include your SIG and contact URL with your
post as we'll be sharing any viable ideas/information in
an upcoming issue of DEMC E-Magazine.
=============
5.
ADVERTISE IN DEMC - * PRICES *
For information on advertising to the DEMC E-Magazine's
175,000 subscribers for as little as $36, plus details on
How To Get a FREE Ad in DEMC E-Magazine Visit Our Web Site:
http://www.demc.com/Advertise/advertise.html
DEMC
PMB 227, 24-G West Main St.
Clinton, CT 06413
(860) 669-4365
(c) 2003 DEMC All rights reserved
View other back issues of DEMC.
Just click to access our email marketing newsletter archive.